
Looking for Affordable Structured Courses?
Comprehensive Structure courses for UPSC, JPSC & BPSC @ Just ₹4,999/-
Table of Contents
ToggleColonialism is a political system in which two distinct political entities are interconnected. It is based on economic interests where one entity exploits while the other is nourished. This framework defined Britain’s relationship with India throughout the modern Indian history timeline.
R.P. Dutt, a Marxist historian, wrote the economic history of India. Since colonialism is based on economic interests, the political or military events of a period are influenced by the British economic interests of that time. R.P. Dutt divided the Indian colonial period into three stages based on economic interests:
This first stage begins with the establishment of British rule in India. EIC (East India Company) was a trading organization that traded goods from India to Britain. During this stage, EIC’s main objective was to establish a monopoly and direct plunder. Therefore, wars were fought solely for these interests. During this period, the British made no changes to the Indian administrative system.
“Indians should be governed by their own customs and traditions” – Warren Hastings
Colonial objectives during this phase included:
In 1813, the British government passed the Charter Act, ending EIC’s monopoly in India, except for trade in tea and with China. In this changing scenario, EIC’s economic interests could be ensured only through direct political control over the maximum regions. The Industrial Revolution in Europe changed EIC’s trade interests. The supply of raw materials and markets for manufactured goods became priorities over direct trade. Direct political control also facilitated this.
Key developments:
The creation of new markets for British goods in India required significant changes in Indian society. It was necessary to create black-skinned Englishmen through:
Outcomes of the Second Stage:
The 1857 revolt woke the British from their slumber. Immediate changes to old policies were deemed necessary. Changes (Government of India Act 1858):
During this period, British capitalists’ investments in India were secured. Limited, unbalanced industrial development occurred in India, including the development of railways, tea plantations, jute mills, and coal mines. However, this industrial growth was still focused on maintaining dependency on Britain.
The British employed two instruments for the conquest of India: war and treaties. In the context of war, their diplomacy proved more effective than their direct battles. Treaties were essentially a part of the British war strategy. Initial treaties were merely a prelude to the next war. The cycle of war and initial treaties continued until the final treaty was concluded. The final treaties aimed to establish British Paramountcy in India.
During the colonial period, the political and military policies adopted by the British in India display a pattern that seems to relate to R.P. Dutt’s economic classification. The four phases are:
During this phase, the EIC (East India Company) was merely a trader trying to establish equality with Indian states. War was the most favorable instrument during this period.
This policy is also known as the Policy of Buffer States. During this period, the British rule in India faced security challenges: internal threats (Marathas, Mysore, etc.) and external threats (invasions from Afghanistan and other regions). The British policy during this period was shaped by these security challenges.
The Policy of Ring Fence involved creating a friendly buffer zone around strategically important areas for security purposes. For instance, the Treaty of Amritsar with Ranjit Singh and Warren Hastings’ policies during the Maratha and Mysore wars reflect this. After establishing themselves in Bengal, the British feared invasions from Afghanistan and the Marathas, so keeping Awadh in a system similar to a subsidiary alliance helped secure Bengal.
Britishers employed the tool of Subsidiary Alliance. States that accepted the Subsidiary Alliance had a British officer, known as a Resident, appointed at their court. During the Policy of Buffer States, this Resident did not interfere in the internal matters of the state and acted as a liaison between the company and the princely state.
During this period, the British Empire in India expanded rapidly. The economic backdrop of this period highlights this new political system. The relationship between the British and Indian states was based on subordinate cooperation. The principle of British paramountcy began to be established.
Under this policy, the native states were free in their internal affairs but had to cede their external sovereignty to the British. British employed the tool of ‘Doctrine of Lapse’, allowing them to take over a native kingdom if the throne lacks a blood heir. However, during the Policy of Subordinate Isolation, the Resident’s influence in internal matters increased.
Charter Act of 1833: This act ended all commercial activities of the EIC and established it as a purely administrative entity.
“Wherever and whenever possible, native states should be incorporated into the company.” — Court of Director (1834)
Government of India Act: This act was introduced as a result of the 1857 uprising. The administration of India shifted indirectly under the British Crown, replacing the EIC. To pacify the agitated people, this act was termed as the first Government of India Act. It was introduced as act for good governance.
The British ceased their policy of annexation and promised not to annex new territories. By this period, British paramountcy was fully established. To mitigate the adverse effects of the Policy of Subordinate Isolation, the Policy of Subordinate Union was established.
Subordinate Union comprised:
[ Notes Download] Modern Indian History Notes PDF: Overview Timeline of Modern History
Download Timeline of modern history notes
Comprehensive Structure courses for UPSC, JPSC & BPSC @ Just ₹4,999/-